Recently came across many Gen'Z-ers... perhaps using post-2000 is better, as Gen'Z defines as people born after 1995.
I am in the cross between Gen'Y and Gen'Z, using mid-'90s as the line between two generations. But this line means a lot - not only to the Gen'Z-ers, but also their parents.
~*~*~*~*~
Today at church choir I happen to be sitting beside the piano, the rest of the choir being opposite to me. One girl sitting on the front row of the choir somehow brought a camera into the chapel.
I wouldn't mind. The thing is, she dropped it - when the choir was singing.
That wasn't everything.
She picked it up, fixed everything (put back the batteries etc etc...) then tested her camera. A flash came out.
Seriously?
I'm not sure if her parents were around, but for sure she didn't have the need to carry a camera into the chapel, did she?
After the choir practice, a parent came in with her son and another kid from the choir, claiming to see the kid disturbing her son verbally and did some kind of "dangerous" actions near his eyes, which can lead to blindness.
My friend whispered by my ears,
"How could she have heard her verbally bully her son?"
Well - even if the parent had super ears to listen to stuff over the walls, why should she complain to the director? Shouldn't her son be the one complaining?
Everything, and everything, nowadays, especially Gen'Zs, rely on their parents.
I don't mean parents shouldn't care anything about their kids, but sometimes it's getting over the line.
~*~*~*~*~
A few months ago, the primary section of our school had a Grade 1 interview. During my time as a G6-er, the interview session was a big thing - it meant a whole day off school, but, as a prefect, I had to return to school to assist the operations.
That seemed normal, didn't it?
Now it doesn't.
This year, on the same occasion, same weekend, only 5 students from the primary sector attended. The rest? All graduated students of the primary sector from the secondary sector.
Ridiculous, eh? We weren't supposed to be there. (I wouldn't admit I actually enjoyed being part of it - but I do not agree we should be the majority of it.)
I wonder if Saturdays meant "must be a day off" or "day full of stuff so important that contributing towards the school is beyond moral values" or whatever. Hmmm.
That's not all about it.
The registration counter for the parents and their kids to register was another problem. Parents were supposed to leave the children alone after registration. They didn't. They stood and waited and waited and waited and waited and panicked a bit and waited more until they were out of their sight. Why couldn't they just leave them alone? My parents did when I was in kindergarten. I cried so loud the teacher had to interrupt the lesson. Still then they didn't ask my parents to come.
It's a process of learning!
You learn to report meanies yourself, you learn your moral values, you learn to be alone. This is the society! What if your parents suddenly left one day? Are you going to cry until you run out of water in your body and die? Learn to live yourself!
CC's Note: I do not mean to be against parents protecting their children. It's correct. But sometimes things go over the line. That's no longer protectionism. It's over-protectionism and it is harmful to anyone's growth.